{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":250,"pdf_page":266,"physical_index":266,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9263891039d3aa0e528bb6ac3d6c2b88c95b2b8fa00c4af7e1ec86b248d30886"},"chapter":"第七章抗争的逻辑","content":"因此，阿兹马诺瓦对亚里桑德罗·费拉拉的观点—在公共领域中，论辩的规范性维度涉及呼吁对方加入一个拓展的社群—提出了批评。通过面向反思性的批评，一种共享的“高阶身份”(superordinate identity)将超越视角的差异。这种“自我一致性”的概念主张，应该始终坚持一个总体的社群标准或自我形象。①虽然费拉拉顾及到了变化，但在许多社群主义理论中，类似的概念导致了对现有社群不切实际的具体化。真实的社群并不是围绕着共同的价值观团结起来的，而被他们对许多共有事情的不同理解区分开来。因此，共同体不能被设定为共识的来源，而应是冲突和辩论不断更新的结果。\n\n然而，虽然我同意对社群主义的批判，但在对技术体系的理解中，共同体认同的概念是有一定地位的。在技术发达的社会里，并非每个人都通过压迫和不公发现自己身份。通过行政和技术活动，很多人专业地服务于所谓的公共利益。这些活动将共同体正式界定的需求转换到工作体系和人造物之中。对技术体系的能动者(agents)来说，公共利益的定义表征了共同体对可操作的有效道德的自我理解。它为专业身份提供了规范性的基础，在动机和执行方面具有重要作用。\n\n172\n\n250\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n①Ibid., 116.","previous_page":249,"next_page":251}