{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":254,"pdf_page":270,"physical_index":270,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d319ca576fdee194f76d295c8e651437bb34484183e061fe51e25f93e7cd2b08"},"chapter":"第七章抗争的逻辑","content":"辩论的结构\n\n阿兹马诺瓦提出了一种公众辩论的理论，适用于研究技术体系的政治。她区分了社会规范结构的四个层面，即政治判断的运作方式：\n\nL1.制度规则和程序\n\nL2.价值和利益的多样性\n\nL3.正义原则\n\nL4.用可表达和有意义的范式编码的“实践智慧”①\n\n这四个层次以复杂的方式相互关联。L1，制度规则和程序，描述了在法律和制度政策所确定的那些领域中的治理形式以及治理对象在日常行为中的相应实践。对于阿兹马诺瓦所提到的领域，我们必须加上技术体系。L2，价值和利益，对应于世界观和美好生活的概念。这一层面反映了社群和个人信仰及价值等其他来源之间的文化差异。技术体系在这里依然扮演着未被认可的角色。L3，正义原则，包含在那些被认为可以恰当地调节公民之间互动的道德规范之中，而不论其在L2层面中的归属、态度和选择。一个共同体如何由其什么是好政策的观念即其政策对所有人的适用性及其规则对行为的约束力做出区分？尽管每个人都可以通过自由主义理论家预设的那种精致的理性论证达成一致，正义原则L3因为太抽象而难以决定政策。但有分歧的共同体的确通过公共辩论就政策问题达成了共识。正是第四层面使其成为可能。\n\n254\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n① Azmanova, The Scandal of Reason, 184- 185.","previous_page":null,"next_page":255}