{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"272 / 188","pdf_page":288,"physical_index":288,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6e5fdc7ffe60819f80760aea3c31fbb7b7ec1331dae74cf4d44f38d1760d5761"},"chapter":"第七章抗争的逻辑","content":"从宏大叙事到局部叙事\n\n在尼克松1972年访华期间，周恩来总理被问及法国大革命的影响。他的回答是：“现在说为时尚早。”②想到这位睿智的政治家，作为5000年中国历史的继承人，对我们西方经历的短暂的进步所表达的保留意见，是令人愉快的。考虑到20世纪发生的那些意外的恐怖事件，他的回答可能适用于整个现代性。\n\n让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔总结出整个20世纪的增长趋势，从而将进步的观念消解为一种幻象。③他强调，尽管在知识和自由上的进步这一“宏大叙事”曾使19世纪备受鼓舞，但它已被对社会组织和科学的“后现代”理解所拒斥。与沃尔特·本杰明(WalterBenjamin)对进步的信仰的控诉相比，这一批评是温和的。在本杰明看来，对进步的信仰已将历史的恐怖粉饰成虚假的荣耀，或类似于阿多诺与马尔库塞对进步的愤怒谴责他们将进步看成为现代技术的毁灭性寻找托辞。然而，所有这些思想家至少原则上都对变革抱有希望。他们的批评意在使进步的概念免于意识形态的滥用。\n\n272\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n188\n\n①有关这种翻译的例子，参见 Adam Branch and Zachariah Mampilly， A frica Uprising: Popular Protest and Political Change (London: Zed Books, 2015)。\n\n② Dean Nicholas, \"Zhou Enlai's Famous Saying Debunked,\"History Today, June 15,2011,http://www.historytoday.com/blog/news-blog/dean-nicholas/zhou-enlais-famous-saying-debunked。这篇文章解释说，实际上参考文献可能是关于1968年5月的事件，但是最初讲述的故事太好了以至于不能被忽视。\n\n③Jean Francois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi (Minneapolis: \\_ University of Minnesota Press, 1991).","previous_page":287,"next_page":289}