{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"283 / 195","pdf_page":299,"physical_index":299,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9b8cba3c9d8f2c97165ec1968041791b3c69bec68260d5165330eaefb4549179"},"chapter":"第七章抗争的逻辑","content":"对欧洲中心主义的有效批评，必须应对这种技术统治论的展望，在全球的传播。在过去的两个世纪里，全世界都接受了欧洲的科学技术优越论。与形式较为陈旧的主权相比，技术的力量及其相关的进步观念在当前更为普遍并更具影响力。可以肯定的是，这不过是一个偶然事实，而不论在认识论上，还是在规范性意义上，它都不是决定性的，但却是事实！技术的力量已经创造了一个世界，其中的跨国公司运用了现代化的科技方法，而其所受到的竞争来自一些流行的运动，即同样的现代科技方法的替代性的应用。抵制工业化的农业和温室气体污染的认知工具是农业生态学和气候科学，而非传统的人种科学，更不是阿赞德巫术。这并不是说，前现代科学和技术不包含有用的知识，而是如今在大多数情况下，知识结合进现代科学技术知识的混合形式时方变\n\n结论：进步的问题\n\n283\n\n195\n\n①温纳(Langdon Winner)在评论埃吕尔(Jacques Ellul)的理论时，称之为“反向适应”。 参见 Langdon Winner,Autonomous Technology:Technics-Out-of-Control as aTheme in PoliticalThought (Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 1977),233-234.","previous_page":298,"next_page":300}