{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":284,"pdf_page":300,"physical_index":300,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8b1fb313b73c43f3271100162a8e7aea67d551995ae8272f3398698b0fcf4daf"},"chapter":"第七章抗争的逻辑","content":"得有效。①\n\n现代与前现代之间的简单对立，不再是当代世界的一股积极力量。作为现代性的开创者，西方在某些方面可以说比那些刚刚开始效仿的国家更为“先进”。但鉴于西方现代性面临诸多严重的问题，西方并没有任何理由傲慢自大。非西方国家寻找解决这些问题的原创性办法将使西方受到教益。在理解种族和人权方面，人们已能将西方所取得的道德进步归功于反殖民主义的抗争。\n\n欧洲中心主义主要通过资本主义和技术侵入非欧洲社会的生活世界。这些力量使世界各地的生活发生嬗变，却往往很少顾及人民的需要和权利。显然，民主之类的规范理念也是强加给非西方社会的，但到目前为止，民主准则似乎被非欧国家有效地“新陈代谢”了，转而成为传统权力关系表达的渠道，同时也使得资本主义发展合法化。\n\n在二战前日本的案例中，我研究过这个过程。②这个例子特别有趣，因为日本在现代化的同时，设法避免殖民化，结果就成为哈贝马斯希望构造而艾伦拒斥的“多元现代性”的一个测试案例。一些著名的日本哲学家预见了后殖民主义的论点。他们反对西方现代性观念中依据进步和落后提出的时间结构，转而主张现代性带来了多种文明的共存。但到目前为止，日本的案例出现了两种明显相互矛盾的倾向一则回顾，一则前瞻，但都不是解放。\n\n284\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n① 如参见, Ana Paula de Moura Varanda and Pedro Claudio Cunca Bo-cayuva, Tecnologia Social, Autogestao e Economia Solidaria(Rio de Janeiro: FASE, 2009); Ron Eglash, Jennifer Croissant, Giovanna de Chiro, and Rayvon Fouche, eds. , Appropriating Technology (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004), pt. 3。\n\n② Feenberg, Between Reason and Experience, chap. 6; \\_Feenberg, Alternative Modernity, chaps. 8-9.","previous_page":null,"next_page":285}