{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":292,"pdf_page":308,"physical_index":308,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b1016abc92b23e6fa072ae582b86ede22af2d92982befd8c2c5f05e4975e236c"},"chapter":"第七章抗争的逻辑","content":"这个对话的沟通过程取决于跨越理性空间的观念桥梁。哲学家们已经显示了弥合鸿沟在原则上的可能性，而未预计其今天所采取的形式。\n\n在不同但互补的方式中，卢卡奇和胡塞尔都对科学技术合理性与生活世界的分离提出了挑战。他们认为，精炼的语言(政治经济学或自然科学的）植根于普通可以获知的生活化(vernacular)的概念和实践。形式合理性源于日常生活的非正式合理性，并与之相互作用。两种形式的合理性都表现出认知性与规范性双重面向。在科学技术的合理性中，规范性面向在很大程度上隐而不显；但在公共理性中规范性则是明确的，这也迫使专家浮出水面。\n\n批判建构主义将这些多重而相互冲突的合理性类型和主张置于特定的域境中，而不是肯定其中一个或另一个的普遍有效性。多元合理性的概念在以合理性制度为中心的现代社会中具有政治意涵。要理解这些意涵，就必须认识到专家和外行行动者所实践的合理性的双重面向。①在技术体系的抗争中，当各种范畴在生活世界中的原初形式与其在技术规训中的精细形式进行对话时，两种形式的合理性进行了合乎理性的沟通。进步性的变革在将公众需求转化为新的设计以回应体系的经验之时达到\n\n202\n\n292\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n①阿佩尔(CarlOttoApel)提出的诠释与说明的“互补性”的概念可以通过其赋予社会内涵而涵盖此多重理性的概念。参见Feenberg，Between Reason and Experience，211-214。","previous_page":null,"next_page":293}