{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":59,"pdf_page":75,"physical_index":75,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d02a84db00dd56cafd950244c236cf974238a20ef344ab185b61665d2a2f752a"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"STS的关切作为广为传播的争论而被扩大，在当代生活的许多方面覆盖了医疗、互联网，以及直接被技术所涉及的环境。作为回应，STS已经变成了政治回应，尽管有时候使用的是不令人信服的政治学概念。④行动者网络理论和希拉·加萨诺夫(SheilaJasanoff)、布莱恩·韦恩(BrianWynne)和其他许多人的工作在尝试理解技术的政治学问题上扩大了对STS的影响。①对混合论坛和合作生产的研究挑战了对哲学和政治学理论中流行的对民主的狭隘理解。②有些STS研究者现在也意识到发展中国家，特别是拉丁美洲所青睐的政治化进路。③但是，在许多才华横溢的案例研究中被列举的STS的先前成就，如何能够在对有争议事件的政治调查的域境下得以保持？对植根于STS起源的理由而言，这就带来了问题。\n\n第二章 批判的建构主义\n\n59\n\n① Wiebe E. Bijker, Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Inside Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995) , 5.\n\n② Langdon Winner, “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology,\" Science, Technology&. Human Values18,no.3(July 1,1993): 362-378, doi:10.1177/016224399301800306.\n\n③ Andrew Feenberg, Critical Theory of Technology (New York; Oxford University Press, 1991).\n\n④关于STS内部对其学者将政治学理论化的批判参见，例如，M.B.Brown， \"Politicizing Science: Conceptions of Politics in Science and Technology Studies,\" Social Studies of Science 45, no. 1 (February 1,2015): 3-30, doi; 10. 1177/03063 12714556694; Linda Soneryd, “Technologies of Participation and the Making of Technologized Futures,\" in RemarkingParticipation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, ed. J. Chilvers and M. Kearnes (London: Routledge, 2015), 144-161.","previous_page":58,"next_page":60}