{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":60,"pdf_page":76,"physical_index":76,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b1a856a9de65f1cee18508ceffdd8d2e4464022157438662a05f5f80762a356b"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"当STS在近年来对公共参与决定技术政策的出现做出回应时，它就向批判的建构主义的关切靠得更近了。④但批判的建构主义通过从早期法兰克福学派批判理论中借用来的控制(domination)概念而仍然在STS的主要贡献中脱颖而出。霍克海默、阿多诺和马尔库塞认为，工具理性与控制具有密切关系，但是呈现出在未来自由社会实现转化的希望。STS和批判理论之间的重要差别因此与合理性相关。有这种事情吗？如果有，其重要性是什么呢?前面一章体现了福柯在将控制分解为特定社会类型的多元性时，确证了工具理性与控制之间的关联。但是，从STS的研究来看，控制大部分消失了。有些STS学者否认合理性概念的相关性，将它还原为各种非合理性的程序。\n\n40\n\n60\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n① Shiela Jasanoff, \"The Idiomof Co-Production,\" in States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and theSocial Order, ed. S. Jasanoff (NewYork: Routledge, 2004) ; Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, eds. , Making Things Public : Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005); Brian Wynne, Rationality and Ritual: Participation and Exclusion in Nuclear Decision-Making (London: Earthscan，2011)。拉图尔和魏贝尔(PeterWeibel)的文本收集了大量根据STS将 政治概念重新概念化的论文和图表。我在这方面所做的努力可以在976—977页 找到。\n\n② Callon, Lascoumes, and Barthe, Acting in an Uncertain World; Chilvers and Kearnes, Remarking Participation; Jasanoff, \"The Idiom of Co-Production.\"\n\n③ Renato Dagnino, Neutralidade da Ciência e Determinismo Tecnológico (Campinas, Brazil: Editora Unicamp, 20o8); Pablo Kreimer, Hernán Thomas, Patricia Rossini, and Alberto Lalouf, eds. , Producción y Uso Social de Cono-cimientos: Estudios Sociales de La Ciencia y la Tecnología en América Latina (Bernal, Argentina: UNQ, 2004); R. Rajao, R. B. Duque, and R. De', \"Introduction; Voices from within and outside the South-Defying STS Epistemologies, Boundaries, and Theories,\" R39, no.6(November 1,2014):767-772,doi;10.1177/0162243914542161.\n\n④例如参见Chilvers and Kearnes,Remarking Participation。","previous_page":59,"next_page":61}