{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"63 / 42","pdf_page":79,"physical_index":79,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c53abf455f7fe50dbfb7d465656b554530fb71e4d285347469c132af322d4ba3"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"诉求所阻止的批判成为可能。\n\n自20世纪30年代中期以来，法兰克福学派日益强调资产阶级文化和无产阶级运动面对大众文化和法西斯主义时的崩溃。第二次世界大战之后占统治地位的自由主义意识形态继续了这些趋势，将技术专家治国论放在公开讨论的核心。社会组织通过参考它们的合理性特征而被辩护，而反对意见则被作为多愁善感的废话而被忽略。在《单向度的人》(One-DimensionalMan)中，马尔库塞通过批判美国社会是被“技术合理性”管理的高度整合的体系而大获成功并使自己成为杰出人物。①他的书回应了发达资本主义世界中年轻人的关切。这一理论的技术细节在当时并没有被广泛研究或理解，但今天它却拥有了令人吃惊的相关性。他不仅宣称技术被管理其创造的资本主义社会力量所塑造，而且也为在进步的社会力量影响下发生技术改变的可能性辩护。\n\n马尔库塞对作为合法化意识形态的“技术合理性”的批判更新了之前马克思主义关于市场合理性的批判。我们时代的社会生活似乎不仅日益依赖于科学和技术，而且反映了科学和技术的程序。效能据说是合理性的并且要求在社会生活的所有层面都得到尊重，合理性因此成为控制的辩解和托辞。“效能的颂歌”从这个关联中获得力量，即便当它对有些受它影响的东西造成灾难性后果时。①批判在它能够摆脱不合理性的一揽子指控之前就被缴械了。谁敢质疑科学的普遍性、中立性和进步的贡献?卢德派成员(Luddites)和其他“浪漫主义者”很容易因为现代科学和技术的压倒性成功而被忽略。\n\n第二章 批判的建构主义\n\n63\n\n42\n\n①根据 Ronald Aronson,“Marcuse Today\"， Boston Review, November 17, 2014, http://www. bostonreview. net/books-ideas/ronald-aronson-herbert-marcuse-one-dime nsional-man-today。《单向度的人》卖了30万册。","previous_page":78,"next_page":80}