{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":64,"pdf_page":80,"physical_index":80,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2427aba9399a6b12371faf117c479758a9265f4b9679a7f68b24019de9a5dcd5"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"马尔库塞版本的批判理论概括了卢卡奇物化概念的核心内容，即资本主义强加了一种合理性文化，将技术操纵置于一切与现实的关系之上。它窄化了人类的理解，并过着与经济体系的要求相符合的生活。资本主义因此决定了社会的相互作用和体验。马尔库塞说：“当技巧成为物质生产的普遍形式时，它限制了整个文化；它规划了一个历史总体性一个世界”。”②\n\n法兰克福学派的第二代和第三代受到了哈贝马斯著作的压倒性影响。他抛弃了第一代对现代性及其乌托邦的荣誉观点(pointd'honneur)的批判，而赞成对社会逐步进步抱有适度的希望。哈贝马斯用从当代社会科学，尤其是体系理论和交流理论吸收来的理念改造了批判理论。他将现代社会划分为两个领域包括管理和市场的“体系”和以交流互动为基础的“生活世界”。③这种二分的框架继续了早期法兰克福学派对控制的批判，却否定了它的总体性的、反乌托邦的(dystopian)结论。\n\n64\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n① Jennifer Karns Alexander, The Mantra of Ef ficiency: From Waterwheelto Social Control (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008).\n\n② Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Boston: Beacon Press, 1964), 154.\n\n③ Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols., trans. T. McCarthy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1984).","previous_page":null,"next_page":65}