{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":76,"pdf_page":92,"physical_index":92,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"98a4a64bd13b8fbc458a703e0435e96b1e27bde5a61b31bc1c9cef4bfa5b8a7d"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"行动者网络理论涉及政治时也有其他问题。这种网络进路导致广泛采取社会与技术合作生产的概念，这个概念很好地适应了对关于技术的政治争论的理解，它使政治理论聚焦于政治的技术中介。但是拉图尔富有野心的理论纲领在将合作生产的概念应用于具体历史案例时并不那么成功。人类和非人类对称的原则意在将研究导向将其联合在一起的网络的物质性，这些网络据说解释所有的宏观实体例如“国家”“意识形态”“阶级”“文化”“自然”和“经济利益”。但是批评者指责拉图尔在界定自然的斗争中支持胜利者的偏向，因为他认为，与好的STS实践相符合，自然在唯一有意义的意义上是由这个网络建构的。但是如果被这样界定的自然是歧视性的呢？如果不是诉诸建立在对自然的不同定义基础上的“自然的”平等，那么关于种族或性别歧视的斗争中的失败者可以诉诸什么呢?①\n\n76\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n① Harry M. Collins and Trevor J. Pinch, The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)。\n\n② Ibid. , 55.\n\n③我参与了关于这一主张的争论。参见 JeffKochan，“Feenberg and STS:Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap,\" Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37, no.4 (December 2006): 702- 720, doi: 10.1016/j. shpsa. 2006. 06.001; Andrew Feenberg, \"Symmetry, Asymmetry and the Real Possibility of Radical Change: Reply to Kochan,\" Studies inHistory and Philosophy of Science 37, no. 4 (December 2006): 721 - 727; Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, “Who Is to Blame for the Challenger Explosion?,\" Studies inHistory and Philosophy of Science 38, no. 1 (March 2007): 254– 255, doi: 10.1016/j. shpsa, 2006.12. 006。","previous_page":75,"next_page":null}