{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"79 / 52","pdf_page":95,"physical_index":95,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1fc85152d8f055c25d5ef2524a068144b39538efad7d048ed624bf13612e40c3"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"批判的建构主义支持歧视性地应用社会建构主义和行动者网络理论的两个对称原则并反对方法论的个人主义。这并不意味着返回前建构主义的实在论和人道主义，但它的确搭建了一座桥梁，以恢复社会思想传统的关键洞见，这些洞见有助于理解从属的社会群体和合理化社会之间的冲突。\n\n随着STS在这些年的发展，它越来越多地参与到敏感的政治议题。但是早期方法论斗争的严峻的紧急情况被研究者抛诸脑后，转而从许多领域借用有用的方法和洞见。批判的建构主义为这种方法论的拼装(bricolage)提供了一种可能的理论框架。\n\n社会技术的公民身份\n\n批判理论赞同行动者理论关于个性的观点，即个性不能独立于其他人和事而来理解。个性来自由家庭及其物质和文化环境所组成的“网络”，因此总是被它在所从属的网络中的角色所规定。但是一旦形成，当它从一个网络转换到另一个网络时，个性就保持了它的身份和能动性，它不可能被分解为它的角色。个体性的这种相对稳定性，是它与所参与的网络保持距离并对其进行批判成为可能的反思能力的基础。①\n\n第二章 批判的建构主义\n\n79\n\n52\n\n① Alvin Ward Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (New York; Basic Books,1970),218-224.","previous_page":94,"next_page":96}