{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":80,"pdf_page":96,"physical_index":96,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f9fac4c12d72025192a2abd62d32214fcb82b23c950a7fd46a151db9ddf7f1b2"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"在法兰克福学派的传统中，个体性被看作是历史成就。资产阶级文化将独立思考的能力一般化到了前所未有的程度。这是个人和政治能动性的基础，是界定个人身份并进而界定其利益的权力。原则上，社会主义将扩大这种能力至每个人，但是在20世纪中叶，法兰克福学派总结道，个体性附属于社会之间短暂的过渡时期，在这些社会中，独立思想要么被习俗和宗教信仰所淹没，要么被技术官僚的意识形态和大众文化所淹没。反思的合理性被技术合理性和私人消费的愉悦消除了，当少数人通过理论和艺术批判而保持思想的独立性时，大众却因消极的服从而遭受非难。①\n\n但是近年来我们看到了公共讨论和行动的领域扩大到了技术问题，而这些问题之前被看作是超越了讨论的界限。随着公共领域的扩大，新形式的能动性出现了。这增加了戴维·赫斯(DavidHess)所说的“对象冲突”，即关于如何根据不同的利益和美好生活的观念来设置技术。②这些冲突的本质是这一章的核心。冲突的增加提出了关于技术和民主的新问题，我们变成了技术公民吗？更确切地说，在技术领域中有政治能动性(politicalagency)吗？如果有，那么它与技术专长和传统政治能动性的关\n\n80\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n53\n\n① Herbert Marcuse, \"The Individual in the Great Society,\" in Towards a Critical Theory ofSociety : Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, ed. D. Kellner, vol. 2 (London: Rougledge, 2001),69–74.\n\n② David J. Hess, Alternative Pathuays in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in and Era of Globalization (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007),80-84.","previous_page":null,"next_page":81}