{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":96,"pdf_page":112,"physical_index":112,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"edbd08601bac3f743fc62ebc9b64e6d041f5c313f8b036d73dffdde8caaa1c96"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"护理人员的反纲领引进了一种不同的认识论，这种认识论适合关怀伦理并以长期病患者的需要为导向。通过叙述个人案例来呼吁移情，在他们的纲领中与英国国家卫生局的定量方法相对应。在这些条件下，治疗被有效地执行了。这类案例研究可以被自上而下地组织，从欲望的思想表述到其在用法、技术特征和功能上的实现。①\n\n合理性的双重方面。批判的建构主义认为，现代性被居统治地位的合理性文化所表征。在这个意义上，合理性不是普遍的而是像文化的其他方面一样是被域境所束缚的。批判的建构主义进一步主张，在真诚的公共讨论中，行动者立场的合理性既具有严格的技术方面也具有内在的规范方面。没有必要借助外部价值来获得规范方面的内容，因为它隐含在被行动者所理解的技术或体系的本质中。公共讨论依赖于技术建构的合理规则，这也是规范性主张的基础。社会技术合理性的双面因此超越了“应该”和“是”的假定分歧。并且，社会技术合理性的不同形式可供专家和外行获取。基本的技术范畴例如“效能”和“兼容性”是日常体验中所熟悉的范畴的精炼版本，因此跨越了专家和外行的界限进行交流。从这一进路中得出的方法论建议是“遵循行动者的理性”①。在这里我将再次用医学的例子来阐明这种进路。\n\n64\n\n96\n\n技术体系：理性的社会生活\n\n①关于这种自上而下方法的例子，参见我的书，Feenberg，Between Reason andExperience, chap. 5。","previous_page":95,"next_page":97}