{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","id":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","uuid":"231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title":"技术体系：理性的社会生活","normalized_title":"技术体系理性的社会生活","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787552024104","isbns":["9787552024104"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":328,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%EF%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/231a69de-8526-4d34-8fa7-231b09af93a8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":97,"pdf_page":113,"physical_index":113,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9e8a88c3cc98eb84e5224e8dbb976c231bffe3a1fbe9c133ae1c95cc93adcb7c"},"chapter":"第二章批判的建构主义","content":"技术最根本地依赖于一种解释性的抽象行为，在这种行为中，实体的有用方面是孤立的并有权并入一个装置。抽象提供了技术元素，这些元素组合在一起，构成了一个由特定实践服务的事物。设计阿尔茨海默病药物的化学家不仅仅是简单地从自然界中抽象出事物；他们还创造了一个有意义的对象，具体的实际义务将由此产生。这些义务被那些对这一产品有不同理解的其他行动者做出了不同的解释。对英国国家卫生局而言，这一药物通过治疗或者至少延缓疾病的进展“起作用”。对护理人员而言，“起作用”有不同的含义：治疗必须减轻护理的负担：治疗的这些规范性方面直接来自被行动者所阐释的它的本质。\n\n这个例子不仅在占主导地位的纲领中，而且在该网络的外行的反纲领中体现了合理性的作用。当然，在纲领和反纲领之间有着重要的区别：专家们必须将外行的观点翻译为技术上合理的规范，才能取得与主导角色已经实现的纲领同等的成功。在这种情况下，医生们会根据不同的流行纲领来理解药物的性质。尽管这并不改变它的化学成分，但它的确在医学体系内重新定义了它。在其他案例中，技术的当前设计可能必须改变，以适应外行的需求。解释的灵活性被理解为合理性的冲突，反映了不同情况\n\n第二章 批判的建构主义\n\n97\n\n① Bensaude-Vincent, L'Opinion Publique et la Science, 190– 191.","previous_page":96,"next_page":98}