{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","uuid":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","normalized_title":"thestackonsoftwareandsovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","isbns":["9780262029575"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":517,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/The%20Stack%20On%20Software%20and%20Sovereignty","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/search"},"page":{"printed_page":380,"pdf_page":394,"physical_index":394,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"dfae021100036309facacbdf501ecab0170b00ae05450fa04a714b937cd87c76"},"chapter":"Fheck The Stack |On Software and Sovereignty Benjamin H. Bratton","content":"13. This ordering order of the State as the guarantor of sovereignty was also, at Westphalia in 1648 as elsewhere, a displacement and replacement of State religion as the ultimate provider of the law of the land. This moment in the invention of secularism was a geographic undertaking, and one that is under attack from the front and the rear at once. The Modern Nomos is fragmenting and perforating, it is distorted and deformed by both planetary computation, which produces new territories in its image, and by resurgent political theology which reconvenes pre-modern geo-jurisdictional domains.\n\n14. Fredric Jameson, “ Notes on the Nomos, ” South Atlantic Quarterly 104, no. 2 (2005): 199–204.\n\n15. “ He interestingly applies this to the growth of piracy at this time too: freedom of the sea vs. limits on land is another hallmark that starts to develop. Two different concepts of the sea begin to be posited: one by France, who finds the sea the common property of all, one by England, who finds the sea to be the property of no one — presaging, of course, future problems. Thus, a seemingly primordial opposition between land and sea (later on itself relativized and historicized) — between landed order and maritime lawlessness — fails, despite the Deleuzian overtones of smooth (maritime) versus striated or landed space, to generate any nostalgia for the nomadic, for gypsies or hunters and gatherers, as that utopian and Rousseauesque valorization of early social forms emerged from L é vi-Straussian structuralism. ” Ibid.\n\n16. For example, Paul Virilio, Open Sky (London: Verso, 1997).\n\n17. Jameson, “ Notes on the Nomos. ”\n\n18. The new space predicates another addressability, just as another addressability predicates the new space.\n\n19. The quote is from Alexander Dugin, a Russian, Eurasian-ultranationalist mystic-sociologistcrank.\n\n20. “ Schmitt referred to ‘ a contemporary German philosopher — Heidegger — who had captured the significance of this Raumrevolution as a paradigm shift which promised to overcome the nihilism of empty space: ‘ Die Welt ist nicht im Raum, sondern der Raum is in der Welt ’ ( ‘ The world is not in space; rather, space is in the world ’ ). Even if these new representations of space had not yet been grasped in coherent conceptual form … . ” Gopal Balakrishnan, The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt (London: Verso, 2000), 244.\n\n21. Ibid., 249.\n\n22. Cornelia Vismann, “ Starting from Scratch: Concepts of Order in No Man ’ s Land, ” in War, Violence and the Modern Condition, ed. Bernd-R ü diger H ü ppauf (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010), 46.\n\n380\n\nNotes","previous_page":379,"next_page":381}