{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","uuid":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","normalized_title":"thestackonsoftwareandsovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","isbns":["9780262029575"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":517,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/The%20Stack%20On%20Software%20and%20Sovereignty","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/search"},"page":{"printed_page":404,"pdf_page":418,"physical_index":418,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8c185b0a4665c181b1b3f8a7c38a70eecc5a82b1cdcda5d06459b206cff93a93"},"chapter":"Fheck The Stack |On Software and Sovereignty Benjamin H. Bratton","content":"74. Saskia Sassen, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).\n\nCity Layer\n\n1. Jean-Luc Godard, Deux ou trois choses que je sais d’elle (Paris: Anouchka Films/ Argos Films/ Les Films du Carrose/ Parc Film, 1967).\n\n2. Italo Calvino, Invisible Cities (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974).\n\n3. Gilles Deleuze, Pourparlers: 1972 – 1990 (Paris: Editions De Minuit, 1990).\n\n4. The term “ junkspace ” refers to Rem Koolhaas ’ essay on the poverty of contemporary environments. See October 100 (Spring 2002): 175 – 190.\n\n5. Sanford Kwinter, “ Digital Pleistocene ” (seminar syllabus, Mediascapes program, SCI-Arc, summer 2008). See https://mediascapes.wikispaces.com/DigitalPleistocene.\n\n6. A positive spin on this dual attention is suggested by Elie During, “ Loose Coexistence: Techologies of Attention in the Age of the Post-Metropolis, ” in Cognitive Architecture: From Biopolitics to Noopolitics: Architecture and Mind in the Age of Communication and Information, ed. Deborah Hauptmann and Warren Neidich (Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010, 2010).\n\n7. Andrea Branzi, No-Stop City: Archizoom Associati (Orle ans: HYX, 2006).́\n\n8. Kazys Varnelis, “ Programming after Program: Archizoom ’ s No-Stop City, ” Praxis: Journal of Writing and Building, May 18, 2006, 82 – 91.\n\n9. Diedrich Diederichsen and Anselm Franke, eds., The Whole Earth California and the Disappearance of the Outside (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2013).\n\n10. The term right to the city comes from Henri Lefebvre, who developed an urban materialism quite different from the one described here, though not necessarily incompatible with it.\n\n11. Steven Graham and Simon Marvin identified this tunnel effect in their Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (London: Routledge, 2001). Among these is the centralization of key bandwidth hubs, often, but not always, in tier 1 global cities linking their trading centers to one another and further accelerating forces consolidating capital into fewer megacenters where it can be efficiently leveraged. Whereas in the dotcom era, some pundits emphasized how information technologies would soon virtualize economic contact and usher in a new era of cybersuburbs (and to an extent it has, but not by hollowing out urban cores as some enthused it would). See William J. Mitchell, City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995), and Joel Kotkin, The New Geography: How the Digital Revolution Is Reshaping the American Landscape (New York: Random House, 2000). It is now clear that while planetary-scale computation does virtualize some kinds of places, its real project, it turns out, is the terraforming of continental interfaces with ferocious effect. In this large-scale bandwidth, provision and access becomes a core spatial planning strategy, whether for small market cities like Kansas City, Missouri, the first test bed for Google ’ s 100 megabyte fiber network, or for large market actors like traders who relocate their offices farther down the island in Manhattan to get closer to the central switches on Wall Street and shave nanoseconds off high-speed trading cycles. Despite its global spread and horizontal ubiquity, for Stack urbanism, proximity to the center, as defined by supermassive concentrations of bit flows, is seen as essential.\n\n404\n\nNotes","previous_page":403,"next_page":405}