{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","uuid":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","normalized_title":"thestackonsoftwareandsovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","isbns":["9780262029575"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":517,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/The%20Stack%20On%20Software%20and%20Sovereignty","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/search"},"page":{"printed_page":418,"pdf_page":432,"physical_index":432,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0bdc237e2c51e89a78c69a270ca312016bd9c451cd43cdf01726e00be582b18f"},"chapter":"Fheck The Stack |On Software and Sovereignty Benjamin H. Bratton","content":"41. I refer to Latour ’ s well-known “ parliament of things ” : We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1993). While despecializing modernist divisions of scientific and interpretive labor is laudable, a “ parliament ” is an inadequate politico-architectural metaphor for the designability and composability of the tumult he describes.\n\n42. Gean Moreno, “ Notes on the Inorganic, Part I: Accelerations, ” E-Flux, no. 31 (January 2012), http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article\\_8946775.pdf.\n\n43. Galloway comments on the tactics of black bloc juxtaposed with the black box, the opaque machine that affects the world within open explication. The goal of black bloc is not to redraw the map or to take a different position within an alternative territory, but to refuse formal appearance altogether, to exist and operate under a cloak of aterritorial nonaddressability. See his “ Black Box, Black Bloc, ” in Communization and Its Discontents: Contestation, Critique, and Contemporary Struggles, ed. Benjamin Noys (New York: Autonomedia, 2012), 237 – 249. With far blunter wit, Brian Holmes articulates resistance to the prevailing “ technosemiotic order, ” its molar enclosures, and their “ cybernetic lines of latitude and longitude … speak[ing)] of exploration and conquest, of industry and trade. ” These can be eluded through the cultivation of alternative schizoanalytic cartographies, and toward this, he warns us solemnly that we must “ Escape the Overcode ” See https://brianholmes.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/book-materials/.\n\n44. On the Aozaki project, see Nobutaka Aozaki, “ Value\\_Added #240950, ” 2012, http:// www.nobutakaaozaki.com/value\\_added.html, and his “ Artist Project/Value Added: # 240950 DM NOSLT WHL KRNL CR, ” Cabinet, no. 47 (Fall 2012).\n\n45. Aozaki ’ s project is also a nice demonstration (and inversion) of the “ double spend problem ” that could plague any digital or networked currency: without discrete physical tokens that guarantee each unit of value is in only one place at a time, how to ensure that the same “ dollar ” is not spent more than once at a time? Blockchains offer the solution of distributed clearing of all transactions so that bitcoin ’ s realm of value-representation remains uncompromised. It does not, however, solve the “ problem ” that Aozaki introduces, which we could perhaps call the “ double acquire problem. ”\n\n46. Rachel Swaby, “ Big Ideas: Spray Wi-Fi Hotspots on to Everything, ” Wired UK, March 30, 2013, http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2013/03/big-ideas/spray-wi-fi-hotspots-on -to-everything.\n\n418\n\nNotes","previous_page":417,"next_page":419}