{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","id":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","uuid":"24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title":"The Stack On Software and Sovereignty","normalized_title":"thestackonsoftwareandsovereignty","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780262029575","isbns":["9780262029575"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":517,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/The%20Stack%20On%20Software%20and%20Sovereignty","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24410bf1-91f1-4e6b-9613-e64f0132d341/search"},"page":{"printed_page":435,"pdf_page":449,"physical_index":449,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"abf80f8b171edadc842cc8d84556ccfb493f622b90f448e90e745819017cd9f4"},"chapter":"Fheck The Stack |On Software and Sovereignty Benjamin H. Bratton","content":"27. Scott F. Gilbert, Jan Sapp, and Alfred I. Tauber, “ A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals, ” Quarterly Review of Biology 87 (2012): 325 – 341, doi:10.1086/668166.\n\n28. On the use of artificial intelligence to analyze large quantities of health data, see, for example, “ Lee Hood Group, ” Institute for Systems Biology, https://www.systemsbiology.org/hood-group.\n\n29. Not so unlike the Earth-figure-cursor rotating its way around the panoramic territory of its own location, leaving a trail of data visualizations along its path in Exit visualizations for the Native Land exhibition, discussed below.\n\n30. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).\n\n31. A tweet from Xeni Jardin @xeni: “ Wondering if (when) a future Son of Sam will blame his evil deeds on a Fitbit he believed to be flashing murderous command prompts. ”\n\n32. Two thoughts: “ I understand why Freud constructed his first psychology on the model of the electrostatisticians. I am not explaining Jules Verne by Freud; I am explaining Freud by the electricity of Verne. It’s so much more amusing, and what’s more, truer. Verne says the same thing. Verne says that it is the same thing to describe a condenser and to liberate its discharge as to translate a coded message into clear terms. Freud stated it, Verne had already recounted it. ” Serres, “ Jules Verne ” (1975); and “ We are taught that corporations have a soul, which is the most terrifying news in the world, ” Deleuze, “ Postscript on Societies of Control ” (1990).\n\n33. Eduardo Mendieta, “ A Letter on Ü berhumanismus: Beyond Posthumanism and Transhumanism. ” in S loterdijk Now, ed. Stuart Elden (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012).\n\n34. Agamben, What Is an Apparatus?, 14.\n\n35. Ibid, 15.\n\n36. Ibid, 17.\n\n37. Giorgio Agamben, The Open: Man and Animal (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).\n\n38. The currency of mediated prosthesis in the 1960s was by no means limited to McLuhan. John McHale proposed an image of architecture as an assembly of prostheses for plural bodies and compound subjectivities that would, on local and global scales, extend their embodiments into the world into and against its expanded ecologies: “ It is not that social life deploys various technologies to sustain itself or that social life can be found within technological space. Rather, social life can only reside in prosthetic accessories. As McHale puts it, man is a social animal only through his extensions. ” John McHale, The Future of the Future (New York: Braziller, 1969). For McHale, modernity is itself a complex of prostheticizations, a global field in which the subjective agency of the human body is extended into a global “ house ” of communications media, transportation, architecture, medicine, ingestive imagery and instrumentality, and so on. It is both an amplification and a diversification of the organism and the species, “ a fundamental transformation of the morphological and social condition of humanity. ” “ The distinction between body and space soon collapses. In ecological terms, human flesh is but a transitional event in the the Next Wave of Networking, ” Wired.com, April 15, 2012, http://www.wired.com/2012/04/ going-with-the-flow-google/all/.\n\nNotes\n\n435","previous_page":434,"next_page":436}