{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","uuid":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","normalized_title":"回到福柯暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","isbns":["9787208136014"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":611,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%9B%9E%E5%88%B0%E7%A6%8F%E6%9F%AF%20%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B%E6%80%A7%E6%9E%84%E5%BA%8F%E4%B8%8E%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E6%B2%BB%E5%AE%89%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD%E6%9E%84%E5%A2%83","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":211,"pdf_page":266,"physical_index":266,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6303cb380384fe97926a743a71a2cb63d70d217eab3b1407d04f854bf1fb23db"},"chapter":"第五章 人：一个晚近的事件","content":"二、作品和作者名字的空心化\n\n青年福柯剖白道，自己对作者不在场的思考并非是要刻意去制造某种简单空洞的断言式口号，譬如与“上帝死了”(尼采)相似的“作者的死亡”，而是希望能真正做一些严肃的讨论。他认为，\n\n我们应该重新审视作者消失所留下的空(vide)的空间；我们应该沿着它的空白和断层(lacunes des lacunes et des failles)的界线，仔细观察它的新的分界线，仔细观察这个空的空间重新分配的情况；我们应该等待由这种消失所释放的流动易变的作用。[14]\n\n那么，与正在消失的作者关系最为密切的东西是什么呢？显然是作品(œuvre)以及作者的名字(nom)了。那么，作品、作者名字与那个缺席的作者留下的空白和断层的关系又是什么呢。\n\n第一方面，我们不妨先来分析作品与正在消失的作者的断层关系。首先，青年福柯指出，在学术思想领域，发现这种隐性的断层的任务落在了真正的批评之上，\n\n批评的任务不是重建作者与其作品之间的关系(rapports del'ouvreàl'auteur)，也不是通过作者的作品重构(reconstituer)他的思想和经验，进一步说，批评应该关注作品的结构(structure)，它的建筑学(architec-ture)，通过研究它们了解它们固有的内在形式(formeintrinsèque)和内部联系(relations internes)。[15]\n\n附文二 话语方式中不在场的作者\n\n211","previous_page":210,"next_page":212}