{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","uuid":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","normalized_title":"回到福柯暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","isbns":["9787208136014"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":611,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%9B%9E%E5%88%B0%E7%A6%8F%E6%9F%AF%20%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B%E6%80%A7%E6%9E%84%E5%BA%8F%E4%B8%8E%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E6%B2%BB%E5%AE%89%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD%E6%9E%84%E5%A2%83","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":220,"pdf_page":275,"physical_index":275,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"12d61447eebb48e4320f95690e6cf3e2fe0d4b02d52008f0b1f83178ce5fcfbc"},"chapter":"第五章 人：一个晚近的事件","content":"回到福柯\n\n样一些提问：\n\n“谁是真正的作者？”\n\n“我们是否能够证明他的真实性和原创性？”\n\n“他用自己的语言对自己最深刻的自我做了怎样的揭示？”\n\n可是，现在人们则会听到一些新的问题：\n\n“这种话语有哪些存在模态？”\n\n“它从哪里来？它如何流通？它受谁控制？”\n\n“针对各种可能的主体将作出怎样的安排?”\n\n“谁能实现主体这些各不相同的功能？”\n\n而在所有这些问题的背后，我们却几乎只能听到一种漠然的咕哝：\n\n“谁在说话重要吗？”[34]\n\n四、一个有趣的争论:结构上没上街?\n\n福柯的演讲结束后，参加会议的学者纷纷发言，有批评，也不乏肯定，福柯也作出了一定的回应。批评的声音，主要集中在福柯所指认的话语实践中作为理性实体的“作者的不在场”问题上。很显然，福柯的这一观点被一些人听成他在《词与物》一书中那个“人之死亡”的断言的具象化，即作者的死亡。\n\n在提问和评论环节上，发言最长的是法国著名的西方马克思主义文学理论家、“发生学的结构主义”代表人物戈德曼[35]。在算是福柯学术前辈的他看来，青年福柯的思想代表了一种“否定一般的人(l'hommeengénéral)”的观点,虽然“福柯没有明说否定作者,但是,从他的作者的消失的视角所揭示的所有的一切都暗示了这一结论”[36]。他反讽地说：\n\n220","previous_page":219,"next_page":221}