{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","uuid":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","normalized_title":"回到福柯暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","isbns":["9787208136014"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":611,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%9B%9E%E5%88%B0%E7%A6%8F%E6%9F%AF%20%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B%E6%80%A7%E6%9E%84%E5%BA%8F%E4%B8%8E%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E6%B2%BB%E5%AE%89%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD%E6%9E%84%E5%A2%83","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":256,"pdf_page":311,"physical_index":311,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d13b7b22c3685a3320be3ee85ac79fd4246e51f80dadcd8301c7fe6c6a09ac9b"},"chapter":"第七章 塑形：从认识型到话语事件场的转变","content":"其次，青年福柯格外认真地提醒我们，切切不能把言说话语事件放置到主体手中(胡塞尔一海德格尔讨论的那种“现成在手”)，比如通常的思想史研究中常出现的所谓“作者的意图，他的思维形式，他的思维的严密性，萦绕在作者头脑中的诸主题，贯穿他一生的并赋予其意义的计划”[20]。这是他反对思想史目的论构式的具体举措。依青年福柯的观点，言说事件是通过非目的论的分布联结起来的，而不能通过将理性推论总体化成一个逻各斯的分有存在来实现，实际上，话语事件只有自己“散落的系统”(systèmesde dispersion)[21]。换而言之,话语言说事件只是在自身的活动“有序、对应关系、位置、功能和转换”中生成的话语的塑形(formationdisursive)。[22]福柯在此书中181 次使用 formation一词。这显然是此书中的高频关键词。我注意到，福柯的老师之一巴什拉在1938年，就著有《科学精神的塑形》一书。[23]前面我已提到，塑形概念缘起于亚里士多德的《形而上学》(古希腊语中的plastikos)，包括后来德文中的Ausformung(赋形)、Formgebung(塑形)、Gestalt(格式塔构式)等这样一些概念及其相关规定在黑格尔、马克思、胡塞尔和海德格尔的哲学中也都有极重要的地位，但也始终没有得到应有的关注。在黑格尔和马克思那里，塑形往往意指劳动对事物的塑形；在胡塞尔和海德格尔笔下，则多指观念塑形；到了福柯这里，则将其推进到更加无影无形的话语塑形。\n\n回到福柯\n\n256","previous_page":255,"next_page":257}