{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","id":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","uuid":"24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title":"回到福柯 暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","normalized_title":"回到福柯暴力性构序与生命治安的话语构境","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208136014","isbns":["9787208136014"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":611,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%9B%9E%E5%88%B0%E7%A6%8F%E6%9F%AF%20%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B%E6%80%A7%E6%9E%84%E5%BA%8F%E4%B8%8E%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E6%B2%BB%E5%AE%89%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD%E6%9E%84%E5%A2%83","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/24db3d42-72f5-4236-8255-80f6ff3283d0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":508,"pdf_page":563,"physical_index":563,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"31b3d0d6b9a31bf54c7f9cb119e0ca13a7de4d8adb582a27d66b7ff458bd2983"},"chapter":"第十五章 自由主义的幻象:市场与公民社会的治理技艺","content":"从政治哲学的角度看，福柯的这种言说路径似乎令人费解。既然是对国家治理技艺的思考，为何先是突然提出真理问题，而后又再跳跃到现实中的市场？他想说的到底是什么?我们看到，福柯此处对国家治理技艺的说明，采取了完全超越传统政治学讨论的框架。他确实是像马克思那样，从资本主义经济活动的内部运行中来说明社会治理的结构性转换的。更彻底一些说，不同于认识型的断裂，这是社会实践构序结构的断裂式转换。福柯告诉人们,市场在西方社会中出现得很早，从中世纪一直到17世纪都有，但传统的市场被标定为“公正的场所(lieudejustice)”,从公正的价格到公正的分配—一直以来，都是人为的管治保证了“欺诈的缺席(absencedefraude)”,从而维系了市场运行的公正化(juridiction)。[19]然而,到18世纪中叶，资本主义的市场却已不再是人为管治之下的公正化场所，一个重要的转折在此时出现:资本主义商品一市场经济中的\n\n回到福柯\n\n508","previous_page":507,"next_page":509}