{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5","id":"2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5","uuid":"2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","normalized_title":"democracyandotherneoliberalfantasiescommunicativecapitalismandleftpolitics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":229,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Democracy%20and%20Other%20Neoliberal%20Fantasies%20Communicative%20Capitalism%20and%20Left%20Politics","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/2619284f-c364-4de3-bdf4-82f768dbc1c5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":89,"pdf_page":99,"physical_index":99,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1ad943ac30255ca7e5323ef7b2f2f02a938d16811f5dd4184d9ad392924820d7"},"chapter":"Comunicative Capitalism & Left Politics","content":"Gutmann's and Thompson's treatment of Stanley Fish illustrates the way that power underpins university discourse. Selectively rehashing criticisms Fish raises in his contribution to a volume dedicated to discussing Gutmann's and Thompson's Democracy and Disagreement (and failing to consider any of Fish's other work), they point out that Fish argues that \"the demand for justification is misguided because it presupposes a shared understanding of what counts as a good reason\" ( 46) . They then claim that Fish \"seems to suggest that there is no way to distin<sub>gu</sub>ish between justified and unjustified exercises of political power\" and that he \"seems to have put democracy on the same moral footing as apartheid, authoritarianism, and fascism\" ( 4 7).\n\nAccusing Gutmann and Thompson of failing to follow their own principle of the economy of moral disagreement as they morph Fish the critic into Fish the fascist is too eas}r. More interesting is their failure to recognize Fish's fundamental point that context matters. This is the idea of a shared understanding: what counts as a good reason depends on reason's setting, tl).e context in which a reason is given. Indeed, Fish's argument is even stronger. Meaning requires limits, discursive parameters establishing the conditions of truth and falsity, of adequation and appropriateness. A justification is convincing not when it is independent of power but due to the prior operation of power in securing the context within which it becomes compelling. Gutmann and Thompson don't consider Fish's account of shared understanding this way. Instead, they insert him into their way of thinking, their episteme, accusing him of reducing al argumentation to power politics. In this way, their refusal even to acknowledge the validity of another epistemology, of another way of thinkng about meaning, principles, and the practice of reason giving, ends up demonstrating Fish's point: context matters, meaning depends on a prior set of conditions.\n\nDEMOCRACY\n\n89","previous_page":88,"next_page":90}