{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":105,"pdf_page":113,"physical_index":113,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3a337338efd26f57dcf1bb618ff8abebb1288ff8eb12b17aa0070251c408ace6"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"当然，这种思辨理性在谢林那里已经转移了其引力中心；理性再也无法用其自我反思的中介去把握自身，而只能在艺术这个临时中介里重新认识自身。但是，按照谢林的看法，在艺术产品中所能直观到的，仍然还是客观理性，即真和善在美中的协调一致。正是这种同一性遭到了施莱格尔的质疑。施莱格尔坚持认为，美要想获得自主性，“就必须同真和道德分离开来，并且要相互拥有平等权利”。①新的神话之所以具有凝聚力，不能归功于所有理性环节协调一致所依赖的艺术，而应归因于诗歌的先知天赋，正是它把诗歌同哲学和科学、伦理和道德区别开来：\n\n因为，这是一切诗歌扬弃理性思维过程和规律的开端，因此，我们又一次处于充满幻想的审美迷狂和人类本性的原初混沌状态。迄今为止，我还没有发现有什么符号比古代诸神恢宏壮观的聚会更美。②\n\n施莱格尔不再把新的神话看作理性的感官化、理念的审美化，因为要走上感官化和审美化这条道路，新的神话就得迎合大众兴趣。相反，只有集理论理性和实践理性的精华于一身的自主诗歌，才能打开通往本源神话权力世界的大门。单纯现代艺术就可以和现代性中已经枯竭的社会一体化的远古源头相互融合。根据这样一种解释，新的神话指望已经分裂的现代性能够和作为理性他者的“本源混沌”建立起联系。\n\n① F. 施莱格尔：《雅典娜残片》（‘Athenäum Fragment')，第 252号，载：《校勘版作品集》，第2卷，第207页；还可参阅K.H. 博雷尔：《施莱格尔论神话(‘Friedrich Schlegels Rede über die Mythologie')，载其：《神话与现代》(Mythos und Moderne)，Frankfurt am Main，1983 年，第 52 页以下。\n\n② F. 施莱格尔：《校勘版作品集》，第2卷，第319页。\n\n105","previous_page":104,"next_page":106}