{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":113,"pdf_page":121,"physical_index":121,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"67949a5b92cc22048cfa4baff042c2c9105227e4e5e01747c2a5baa65c8abcd2"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"尼采对现代性的批判在两条路线上被发扬光大。怀疑主义科学家试图用人类学、心理学和历史学等方法来揭示权力意志的反常化、反动力量的抵抗、以主体为中心的理性的兴起等等，就此而言，巴塔耶、拉康、福科堪称是尼采的追随者；比较内行的形而上学批判者则采用一种特殊的知识，把主体哲学的形成一直追溯到前苏格拉底，就此而言，海德格尔和德里达可谓步了尼采的后尘。\n\n4\n\n海德格尔愿意接受的是尼采的酒神弥赛亚主义的主要动机，对其具有自我关涉特征的理性批判所遇到的困惑却避而不理。从事“科学”研究的尼采想用真理信仰和禁欲观念的谱系学来摆脱现代思想；海德格尔则觉得，这种权力理论的揭示策略中启蒙的残渣余滓并没有被彻底剔除，因此，他更看重的是作为“哲学家”的尼采。尼采用强烈而又彻底的意识形态批判所孜孜以求的目标，海德格尔则想通过从内部对西方形而上学进行颠覆来实现。尼采用酒神事件作为桥梁把古希腊悲剧和新的神话接续了起来。海德格尔的后期哲学可以说是努力把酒神事件由经过审美更新的神话舞台搬迁到哲学舞台。①海德格尔面临的首要任务在于，把哲学放到尼采认为应由艺术(作为虚无主义的反动)占据的位置上，以便能够对哲学思想加以转化，使之成为凝聚和更新酒神力量的舞台。海德格尔想把虚无主义的产生和克服看作是形而上学的开端和终结。\n\n① 1935—1945年的十年间，也就是在写作《形而上学导论》和《关于人道主义的通信》期间，海德格尔曾对尼采作过长期研究。他有关存在的历史观念就是在研究尼采过程中形成的。对于这点，海德格尔在1961年出版的两卷本《尼采》一书前言里毫不讳言。详见：《尼采》，Pfullingen，1961年，第1卷，第9页及以下。\n\n113","previous_page":112,"next_page":114}