{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":115,"pdf_page":123,"physical_index":123,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7c3eee32479ae0d078cc69a44c69650e207c66ac8426aab434aaff7e431ee96b"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"这一点后来变成了由诗人宣布神圣物对思想家的启示。诗和思尽管相互关联，但说到底诗还是来源于本源的思。②这样艺术就被本体化了。③从此，哲学必须再次承担起被浪漫派转嫁到艺术头上的使命，这就是为宗教的一体化力量找到替代物，以便克服现代性的分裂。尼采寄希望于经过审美革新的酒神神话，想用它来克服虚无主义。海德格尔则把酒神事件放到形而上学批判背景之上，这样就使形而上学批判具有了普世意义。\n\n现在看来，存在已经离开了存在者，并用故意缺席和强烈的匮乏痛苦预言其不确定的未来。思追究了存在在西方哲学中被遗忘的历史命运。思具有一种催化作用。思来源于形而上学，同时又对形而上学刨根问底，这样就从内部冲破了形而上学的界限。思已不再赞同坚持自律的理性的自信。掩盖在存在身上的层层面面的确需要打破。但是，和反思力量不同，解构工作旨在揭示一种新的他律。这种新的他律只把力量集中于主体性的自我克服和自暴自弃。主体性必须学会克制，并且应当保持谦恭。理性本身只能从事遗忘和驱逐这两样有百害而无一利的活动。回忆也无法使放逐回头。结果导致存在只是一种机遇，一切需要它的东西都会尽量对它敞开，并严阵以待。海德格尔的理性批判说到底和彻底改变一种虽然无所不在却毫无意义的立场—远离自律，献身存在，以此来克服自律和他律之间的矛\n\n① 海德格尔：《尼采》，第1卷，第231页。\n\n② 《何谓形而上学》，“后记”，载海德格尔：《路标》(Wegmarken),Frankfurt amMain,1978,第 309 页。\n\n③ 海德格尔在他关于尼采的第一讲中总结说：“从存在的本质来看，必须把艺术理解为存在者的基本事件和本真创造者。”\n\n115","previous_page":114,"next_page":116}