{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":123,"pdf_page":131,"physical_index":131,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a6be6a455b16f6c00a6bb2ddfbc42ed26f1c2898064c4f4af7e5d56c264f58ef"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"因此，我将首先阐明其中的两个核心主题。(1)对现代性的评价引起了一些问题，从而让我注意到了当下状况：霍克海默和阿多诺为什么力图以激进的方式阐明启蒙；(2)尼采是主张让意识形态批判通过总体化实现自我超越的伟大楷模。把尼采同霍克海默和阿多诺进行比较，能够让我们了解他们的文化批判的不同路径(3)，而且也可以激发起我们对启蒙再次具有反思意识的怀疑(4)。\n\n1\n\n在启蒙的传统中，启蒙思想总是被理解为神话的对立面和反动力量。之所以说是神话的对立面，是因为启蒙用更好论据的非强制的强制力量来反对世代延续的传统的权威约束。之所以说是神话的反动力量，是因为启蒙使个体获得了洞察力，并转换为行为动机，从而打破了集体力量的束缚。启蒙反对神话，并因此而逃脱了神话的控制。①霍克海默和阿多诺则认为启蒙与神话之间具有密谋关系。这在启蒙思想中表现得相当显著：“神话就已是启蒙，而启蒙又变成了神话。”②这一主题在前言中就已经说得清清楚楚，在主导论文中得到了阐述，并在对《奥德赛》的阐释中得到了进一步的证明。\n\n① K. 海因里希：《论难以说不》(Versuch über die Schwierigkeit Nein zu sagen) , Frankfurt am Main, 1964。\n\n② 《启蒙辩证法》(Dialektik der Aufklärung),Amsterdam,1947,第10 页；并请参阅我为该书新版撰写的后记，Frankfurt am Main,1985。\n\n123","previous_page":122,"next_page":124}