{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":241,"pdf_page":249,"physical_index":249,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f7ddf4cc4f2c95d3a21bb1bc9c5ba92539f3d3a0a683c3cb81aef1acc9ca0abe"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"清楚语言的内在散文功能。①\n\n语言的中介过程，诸如知识传承、文化传统、认同结构以及社会化和社会一体化等，克服了世界上的问题。德里达无法认识的学习过程，其独立性得益于这些问题的独特性以及应对这些问题的语言媒介。对德里达来说，世界中的语言中介过程扎根于一个预设一切的世界观语境当中。它们被宿命般地交付给了难以控制的文本创造过程，并淹没在原始书写所展示出来的诗性一创造性的变化语境当中，注定具有局部性。审美语境主义使得德里达无视如下事实：依靠交往行为中的理想化，日常交往实践使得学习过程成为可能。而解释性语言必须依靠这些学习过程才能持续释放出揭示世界的力量。学习过程显示出了一种超越一切局部约束的独特意义，因为经验与判断只有依靠可以批判检验的有效性要求才能构成。德里达忽略了以沟通为取向的行为的有效性基础所具有的否定力量。他让语言创造世界的能力先于语言解决问题的能力。而语言解决问题的能力属于作为媒介的语言，有了这种能力，如果交往行为者相互之间就客观世界的事物、共同的社会世界或各自所特有的主观世界中的事物达成共识，他们就与世界建立起了关联。\n\n理查德·罗蒂也主张消除文类之间的差异，但他和德里达的区别在于他并没有从唯心主义角度出发，顽固地捍卫作为决定内在世界的超越事件的形而上学历史。按照罗蒂的理解，科学与道德、经济与政治以及艺术和哲学等，都离不开一个语言创造出来的美妙过程。和托马斯·库恩的科学史一样，解释在语言革命化与语言规范化之间有节奏地变换。在一切文化生活领域，罗蒂都发现了两种不同语境的上述变换：\n\n① 请参阅哈贝马斯：《交往行为理论》，第1卷，第374页以下。\n\n241","previous_page":240,"next_page":242}