{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":301,"pdf_page":309,"physical_index":309,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"dce5860275429590f1057f1c54d4c9d367c1a73a4b1555f75ccb6f180ffa4f1b"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"海德格尔把源始哲学的思维结构推向了激进，而对于这种哲学，他还是有些信心的。他把真实有效性的认识权威转移到了揭示世界的视域的形成与转变过程之中。真实性条件本身既不可能为真，也不可能为假，但是，其变化过程则具备一种附加的有效性，而且应当根据命题的真实有效性把这种附加的有效性设想为真实性的历史化上升形式。严格说来，海德格尔用作为真实事件的存在历史概念所取得的是如下奇特的混合：存在历史的权威取决于无强制性的有效性要求和命令式的权力要求之间的意义混合。这种权力要求赋予认识的颠覆力量以一种使人屈服的强制性。福科回避了这种伪宗教的转向，为此，他对人文科学所抱的信心微乎其微，并重新激活了巴塔耶异质性的隔离思想，把它用来实现自己的目的。福科剥夺了话语构成规则历史的一切权威性，对先验权力话语形态做了认真的考察，一如人们在传统的历史学中对政治制度的兴衰所做的考察。如果说，知识考古学(类似于对形而上学史的解构)重建了话语构成规则的基础，那么，谱系学则试图：\n\n对(并非建立在自身之上的)符号制度的非连续性做出解释，这些符号制度迫使人们进入解释世界的语义学框架之中。①\n\n① 霍耐特：《权力批判》(Kritik der Macht), Frankfurt am Main, 1985,第 142页以下。\n\n301","previous_page":300,"next_page":302}