{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":305,"pdf_page":313,"physical_index":313,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cdcdb2dbbc5ab66ff9762f26cfa2b797a60da1f3650d2643ac6e53c861aff61a"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"古典语言的深刻使命总是创立“图表”：或是作为自然话语、真理的汇集、事物的描述、精确的认识体系，或是作为一部百科全书字典。于是，古典语言存在着，只是为了透明……在古典经验中，认识事物及其秩序的可能性通过词的独立自主而产生了：确切说来，词既不是将被破译的记号(如同在文艺复兴时期那样)，也不是……可控制的工具(如同在实证主义时期那样)；词形成了一张毫无色彩的网络：从这张网络出发，……表象得到了整理。①\n\n由于这种自主性，符号便无私地服务于对事物的表现：在符号中，主体的观念与被表现客体遇到了一起，并通过一连串的表现而构成一种秩序。\n\n今天我们或许会说，语言完全投入到了描摹事实的功能当中，而且，它在同一个层面上重新给出能够表现的一切一想像主体的自然与被想像客体的自然没有什么区别。也就是说，在这样一种图景中，人的自然并不优先于事物的自然。内在自然和外在自然以同样的方式被区分、分析和组合—普遍语法意义上的语词以及政治经济学意义上的财富和需求，与林奈系统中的动植物分类没有什么区别。当然，这一点也揭示出古典时期非反思知识形式的局限性：知识完全依赖于语言的表现结构，而无法把表现过程自身(想像主体自身的综合能力)囊括进去。福科在他对委拉斯凯兹的名画《宫娥》所做的惊人阐释中分析了(古典知识形式)的局限性。①\n\n① 福科：《事物的秩序》(Die Ordnung der Dinge),Frankfurt am Main,1971,第376页。\n\n305","previous_page":304,"next_page":306}