{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":314,"pdf_page":322,"physical_index":322,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"22e1b3b457ced1b5f7d1a19ac88f852f292a23721d63a8d5a430b4eb43a4b453"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"十 权力理论的困境\n\n1\n\n人文科学考古学用知识生产的自我强制作为动力，不仅仅是促使知识和求知意志纠缠到了一起；《事物的秩序》也提出了一些问题，对于这些问题，福科多年后作了回答：他用求知意志来阐明作为其谱系学历史写作基础的权力概念。请允许我在这里指出福科所遇到的三个难题。\n\n（1）首先，福科没有认识到他的人文科学考古学与海德格尔的现代形而上学批判之间明显存在的亲和性。文艺复兴、古典时期以及现代的知识型或知识形态，既是一种划时代的标志，同时也表现为以主体为中心的存在概念的不同发展阶段；海德格尔曾用类似于从笛卡尔经康德直到尼采而发展起来的概念对存在作了分析。但福科无法选择一条用形而上学批判来克服主体哲学的途径。因为，他已经明确指出，即使是存在历史的概念，也没有走出自我关涉的主体的第三种自我表现的怪圈，即主体依然企图把握住一个不断退缩的起源。这就是海德格尔晚期哲学的主题，它依然是一种奇怪的游戏，对此，福科曾以“起源的退缩和回归”为题作了探讨。由于这个原因，福科后来不得不彻\n\n314","previous_page":313,"next_page":315}