{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":364,"pdf_page":372,"physical_index":372,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"10aa9c6ff8d7bf77a67dc4965a4d146aea910ddc965941025227a1a0aa421d67"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"(a)真值语义学是从弗雷格到达米特和戴维森而发展起来的。和胡塞尔的意义理论一样，真值语义学的出发点也是一种逻各斯中心主义:断言命题的真实性关联和用于实现一定意图的意向性命题的间接的真实性关涉，为解释语言观念提供了一个恰当的起点。因此，真值语义学得出了这样一条基本原则：我们要想理解一个命题，首先就要了解使这个命题为真的条件。\n\n①阿佩尔：《人类语言的逻各斯特征：言语行为理论的哲学意义》(DieLogosauszeichnung der menschlichen Sprache. Die philosophische Tragueite der Sprechakttheorie),手稿,Frankfurt am Main, 1984。\n\n364","previous_page":363,"next_page":365}