{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":366,"pdf_page":374,"physical_index":374,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d6c86208a68049b419d6bd9ddcd8969c439dc27d668a7af955694fa6dfcaffa3"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"现象学特别是海德格尔所阐述的生活世界参照关系概念，同样也需要进一步加以拓展，它们在互动参与者背后构成了一个不成问题的沟通语境。参与者从这个生活世界中所汲取的，不再单纯是共识的阐释模式(命题内涵所依靠的背景知识)，而且还有规范可靠的关系模式(悄悄设定的团结，用做以言行事行为的基础)以及在社会化过程中获得的能力(言语者的意向背景)。\n\n(c)我们最初认为“理性”是具有言语能力和行为能力的主体的基本品质，以此可以获得和使用容易出错的知识。只要意识哲学的基本概念迫使我们把知识仅仅理解为关于客观世界事物的知识，那么，理性所要衡量的就是，孤立的主体是如何把他的想像内涵和命题内涵作为自己的取向的。以主体为中心的理性在真理和成功的标准中找到了自己的准则，而具有认知能力和目的行为能力的主体与客观世界或客观事态所构成的世界之间的关系，就是由这些真理和成功的标准支配的。相反，我们一旦把知识看作是以交往为中介的知识，那么，理性所要衡量的就是，负责的互动参与者能否把主体间相互承认的有效性要求作为自已的取向。交往理性发现，其标准在于直接或间接兑现命题真实性、规范正确性、主观真诚性以及审美和谐性等有效性要求所使用的论证程序。①\n\n366","previous_page":365,"next_page":367}