{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":370,"pdf_page":378,"physical_index":378,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"daa9fd95c2d6bb9829db4d396c39c5f63d4047a606c6285ab265b320c1e59304"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"实践哲学的语言学转向同样也没有导致范式转型。言语主体要么是语言系统的主人，要么是语言系统的守望者。他们要么使用语言创造意义，以便不断地揭示世界；要么总是在一个揭示世界的不定视域中活动。对他们来说，揭示世界依靠的是语言自身—语言成为一种创造性实践的中介(卡斯托里亚迪斯)或成为一种差异性的事件(海德格尔和德里达)。\n\n卡斯托里亚迪斯用语言哲学的方法阐述一种关于想像制度的理论，大胆地发展了实践哲学。为了重新赋予社会实践概念以革命的爆发力和规范的内涵，卡斯托里亚迪斯不再从表现主义的角度而是从造物的角度，把行为视为绝对新颖、绝对独特的原始创造，而且，每一个创造形式都打开了一个无与伦比的意义视域。对现代性的合理内涵的保障——自我意识、真正的自我实现和团结中的自我决定等，被认为是用语言创造出来的想像力。当然，这就非常接近于没有任何根基的存在，从而引起了人们的质疑。最终，在唯意志论的“自力更生”与宿命论的“听天由命”之间，有的只是一种修辞学上的差别。\n\n按照卡斯托里亚迪斯的理解，社会和先验主体性一样，分为创造者和创造物、建构者和建构物，在此过程中，作为意义源泉的想像之流不断涌入相互交织的语言世界观当中。这是对意义总体性的绝对崭新和不断更新的本体论创造；它的发生犹如存在的天命一般；这种历史真理的创造性发生如何才能转换为个体(他们具有行为意识和自主性，而且能够自我实现)的革命实践计划，对此，我们无从得知。自律性和他律性最终要用一个社会本真的自明性来加以衡量，而这个社会不能用社会外部的投影来遮蔽其想像的源头，并把自己明确为一个自我建构的社会。\n\n370","previous_page":369,"next_page":371}