{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","id":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","uuid":"296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title":"现代性的哲学话语","normalized_title":"现代性的哲学话语","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544715829","isbns":["9787544715829"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":463,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/296fac69-2927-4952-8b17-011f7141a0cd/search"},"page":{"printed_page":81,"pdf_page":89,"physical_index":89,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e3b64d8176f231c50e371dbec68efe7088dcee8d40e74779b69864298799515c"},"chapter":"现代性的哲学话语","content":"后来，马克斯·韦伯继承了这一批判并使之更加尖锐。他认为，私人资本主义制度的崩溃并不意味着现代工业劳动铁笼的破裂，他的这一诊断是正确的。“现实存在的社会主义”不过是想把市民社会融入政治社会，而实际上导致的结果是官僚化。它只是把经济强制扩张成为渗透到所有生活领域的行政控制。\n\n另一方面，黑格尔右派由于对强大国家的再生能力深信不疑而遭受了巨大的挫折。罗森克朗茨仍然在捍卫君主制，因为只有君主制才能确保政府独立于党派之外而保持中立，消除不同利益之间的对抗，并保证个别与一般的统一。在罗森克朗茨看来，这种政府必须是最高权力机关，因为只有政府“才能知道公共意见中什么是最紧迫的”。③这种观点在思想史上形成了一个流派，经过卡尔·施米特，一直贯穿到那些认为魏玛共和国难以治理因而主张极权国家的宪法学家那里。④沿着这一传统，实质国家的概念转换成了赤裸裸的极权国家。因为在这同时，黑格尔右派所坚持的主观精神、客观精神和绝对精神之间的等级秩序已经彻底被打破了。①\n\n① 卢贝毫无改动地持这种观点。卢贝：《公民政治哲学面面观》(Aspekte derpolitischen Philosophie des Buergers')，载其：《启蒙运动之后的哲学》(Philosophienach der Aufklärung),Düsseldorf,1980,第 211 页以下。\n\n② 奥本海姆，载卢贝：《黑格尔右派》，第196页。\n\n③ 罗森克朗茨，载卢贝：《黑格尔右派》，第72页。\n\n④ 关于E. 福尔斯托夫、E. R. 胡贝尔、K. 拉伦茨等人的相关著述，请参阅H. 马尔库塞：《与集权主义国家观念中自由主义的斗争》(‘Der Kampf gegen den Lib-eralismus in der totalitären Staatsauffassung')，载：《社会研究杂志》(Zeitschrift fürSozialforschung),1934,第161 页及下两页。\n\n81","previous_page":80,"next_page":82}