{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","uuid":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":108,"pdf_page":137,"physical_index":137,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e2334ab7a269417e78f740d58d52a171df1e1a23f00b2821c384feb0a659622d"},"chapter":"第三章历史唯物主义与规范结构的发展","content":"在建立存在于资本主义经济和现代国家中的交往的普遍形式的过程中，那种朝向犹太基督教和古希腊本体论遗产的态度又在某种主体性倾向中得到了折射(宗教改革和现代哲学)，最高原则失去了它不容质疑的特性，宗教信仰和理论态度都成了反思性的。现代科学的进步和道德-实践意志形成物的发展，因不再根据某种规则——这种规则虽有根基，却纯属专断——而受到歧视。破天荒的第一次，那种已经在理性化世界观中获得的普遍性潜能能够被释放出来，世界的统一再也不是根据哲学实在化的统一原则(上帝，存在或自然)来对象式地促成。从此后，世界的统一将只是反思性的，并通过理智的统一(或通过理性的世界组织，即理智的现实化)而被断言。这样，理论理智与实践理智的统一，对于当代世界的译解(这种译解已经失去了其作为世界观的特征)来说，就成了问题的关键。\n\n上面这些简略的讨论，只是想指出自我结构与世界观结构具有相似性这种推测所包含的启发性成果。在这两种侧度中，发展显然都导致译解系统某种日益增长的非中心化(decentration)，④并且导致与外在自然的客体性、规范的社会现实性以及语言现实的主观际性不同的、关于内在自然之主体性的、较过去更为清晰的范畴界定。\n\n108\n\n国外马克思主之和社会主义研究丛书","previous_page":107,"next_page":null}