{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","uuid":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":241,"pdf_page":270,"physical_index":270,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3456f7f8b1ea1250d7d24b6e9d50e69fa673e07a8d0036b81fa60e647a8d4359"},"chapter":"第五章现代国家中的合法化问题","content":"17.关于“内在”自然与“外在”自然的概念，可参考J·哈贝马斯《认识与人的意趋》(Boston,1971),《合法化危机>(Boston,1975),PP8ff。\n\n18.斯大林《辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义》。\n\n19.J·帕希尔卡“马克思主义关于早期阶级社会分析中的亚细亚生产 方式问题”“Von der asiatischen Produktionsweise Zu einer marxistischen Analyse der frühen Klassenge Sellschaften\"],载Eirene(Prague,1967),PP141\\~174;L·V·丹尼洛娃“关于前资本主义社会理论中的若 于论争问题”[“Controversial Problems of the Theory of Precapitalist Societies”],载《苏联人类学与考古学[Soviet Anthropology and Archeology)9(Spring,1971),PP269\\~327。\n\n20.M·古德莱尔《马克思主义人类学透视》[Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology](Cambridge,1976).\n\n21.O·马科特<历史哲学遇到的障碍》[Schwierigkeiten mit der Geschichtsphilosophie](Fronkfurt,1973)。\n\n22. 见前一章。\n\n23.在一篇未发表的、关于进化理论的手稿中，N·卢曼提出了在这种联结中运动概念的可应用性的疑问。\n\n24.卢曼在<注23>提及的手稿中已经指出了这一点。\n\n25.参看我对卢曼的批评，载]·哈贝马斯、N·卢曼《社会理论[Theorie der Gesellschaft](Frankfurt,1971),PP150ff;还可参考R·道勃特 系统理论与宗教解释系统的发展»Systemtheorie und die Entwicklung religiöser Deutungssysteme)(Frankfurt,1973),PP66ff。\n\n26.例如，H·吉瑞克在“封建社会中生产力与生产关系的辩证法” (\"Zur Dialektik von Produktivkraft und Produktionsverhäitnis im Feudalismus”]，(载历史科学期刊>16(1966),PP914\\~932)中就曾把“增\n\n注\n\n释\n\n241","previous_page":240,"next_page":242}