{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","id":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","uuid":"35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/35f93a8e-9b35-4e9b-8460-73b3e4067e0b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":244,"pdf_page":273,"physical_index":273,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"dfe9db7342c61319a0ff00f3590a2389e9c0fcdbaf37c53c6ea0864e767a6d6e"},"chapter":"第五章现代国家中的合法化问题","content":"midt);F·奥本海米尔(Oppenheimer);还有A·鲁斯塔夫(Rüstow)。\n\n57.W·E·缪荷曼“统阶与国家”[“Herrschaft und Staat”，载《种族， 民族与文化[Rassen,Ethnien,Kulturen](Neuwied,1964),PP248\\~296.\n\n58.这种观点最初由马克思和恩格斯在《德意志意识形态》中提出，后来有了许多的信奉者。V·G·柴尔德就是一个很好的代表，这在他的《旧世界的前历史[Old World Prehistory](London，1938)…书中已初见端倪。\n\n59.G·E·兰斯基«力量与特权»[Power and Privilege](New Yor-k，1966)。早些时，我也曾支持过这种观点，见我的《走向一个理性的社会》P94,《社会理论PP153\\~175。\n\n60.K·L· 卡纳尔罗“一种国家起源的理论”[“A Theory of the Ori-gin of the State”],载《科学》杂怎[Science〕169(1970),PP733\\~738。\n\n61.K·A·维特弗格尔《中国社会历史»CHistory of Chinese Soci-ety〕（Philadelphia，1946)，《东方专制政府：关于总体力量的比较研究(Oriental Despotism:A Comparatire Study of Total Power) (NewHaven,1957)。\n\n62.R·柯尔伯恩“文明社会兴衰的结构与过程”[“Structure and Proc-ess in the Rise and Fall of Civilized Societies\"], 载«历史与社会比较研究8(1965\\~1966);卡纳尔罗“一种国家起源的理论”。\n\n63.在此，我利用了K·埃德提供的概略，见《德国社会学家代表大会[D-eutschen Soziologentag),16(in Kassel,1974).\n\n64.同上,P14.\n\n65.同上,P15.\n\n66. 同上。\n\n67.“深深扎根的矛盾在于：对自然的控制和人的自我实现有时不得不处于对立之中，因为前一个过程为了自身的增长效果要求把奴役作为实现组织化和动员劳动力量的手段，而后者却把自由当作自已的目标和基础。确实，归根结底，对自然的控制只有在人的自我实现，人的关系的人性化得以成功时才有意义。”维尔斯科夫“场景变换与进步脉冲”，P131。\n\n68. K·波普尔<历史主义的贫困The Poverty of Historicism)(London,1966)。\n\n69.C·H·瓦丁顿<伦理动物)[The Ethical Animal〕(Chicago,1960).\n\n70.参见W·莱普尼斯和H·H·李特主编的《野性思维的位置》〔Orte\n\n244\n\n国外马克思主义和社会主义研究丛书","previous_page":243,"next_page":245}