{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","title":"超文化：文化与全球化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787521748666","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","id":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","uuid":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","title":"超文化：文化与全球化","normalized_title":"超文化文化与全球化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787521748666","isbns":["9787521748666"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":112,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B6%85%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%EF%BC%9A%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E4%B8%8E%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/search"},"page":{"printed_page":34,"pdf_page":38,"physical_index":38,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8bad8aa5160dae4b3e18c1ba552d33ba68fb4e106570e93d054101fb0cd3fbe1"},"chapter":"Hyperkulturalität","content":"一条根束而已。”\n\n作为飞跨的通道，海德格尔以及霍米·巴巴的桥“让河岸相对而立”，迥异于根茎。根茎的中间部位不是互转通道，它躲避或流动得太快，以至于无法“协商”。德勒兹认为，“在事物之间”(Zwischen den Dingen）“并不意味着一种自此至彼、反之亦然的可定位关系”，而是一种“向着一个方向与另一个方向的横向运动”。因此，根茎的“之间”不是“间隙通道”，而是“无头无尾的溪流，它冲刷着两岸，其中间部位流动越发加速”[41]。根茎的“之间”不具有对抗性。\n\n塑造它的，不是对立而是接合，因此，它或许比霍米·巴巴“充满冲突”的间隙空间友善得多。它既没有终极性，也没有排他性：“根茎不分首尾，它是…中间的一块，宛如插曲（Intermezzo)。树是承袭，而根茎是结盟，彻头彻尾的结盟。树需要动词‘是’（sein），而根茎则在连词‘与（Und）……与……与’中寻得关联，这个连词有足够的力量撼动动词‘是’并将它连根拔起。”[42]这种根茎式的、非辩证的甚至友善的“与”是值得关注的。根茎的“与的逻辑”产生了“无意指”（asignifikant)的关联，即无关的有关、不同的同步、切近的去远。这种逻辑使文化连字符化[43]，从而成为超文化。[44]即使没有“深层”“内在”的语境，这些连字符也会彼此联结，彼此调和。\n\n34\n\n超文化","previous_page":33,"next_page":35}