{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","title":"超文化：文化与全球化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787521748666","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","id":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","uuid":"3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","title":"超文化：文化与全球化","normalized_title":"超文化文化与全球化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787521748666","isbns":["9787521748666"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":112,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B6%85%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%EF%BC%9A%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E4%B8%8E%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/3dbdb0de-b140-4663-a78e-429e74d8b488/search"},"page":{"printed_page":42,"pdf_page":44,"physical_index":44,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6265ea0a323a9de283e2ce23495f483b919939ee73a9fdee1f84382cb4087df4"},"chapter":"Hyperkulturalität","content":"今天的全球化不仅仅是居处之间的交流。无论文化形式从一个居处迁移到另一个居处，还是一个居处的文化影响到另一个居处的文化，都无法形成全球化，而今天的全球化却能改变居处。全球化使居处失去了内在性，消除了赋予居处以灵魂的“尖”。当文化的表现形式在去居处化的过程中脱离本位，并对超文化下的并置和同时性趋之若鹜，此时此地的独一无二性因无处不在的复制而消失，光晕就逐渐消失。全球可复制时代的文化不再是带有光晕的此时此地的文化。然而，居处的去光晕化不能以类似海德格尔文化批评的方式，被单方面地指摘为“深度”“源始”“实体”或“本真性”乃至存在的丧失。超文化的无居处性可谓存在的另一种印记。深度或源始难道不是表面（Oberfläche，“界面”）的特殊作用吗？[49]\n\n本雅明认为，光晕是一种“距离的独有外观”。光晕的消失是“热情地关注”“事物在空间和人性上彼此贴近”所导致的结果。[50]光晕消失的根源在于通过“去远”进而占有事物的人性渴望。为什么要对这种“切近”加以谴责？面对事物依然停滞在远处的痛苦，光晕难道不是制造不幸意识的美丽假象吗？\n\n42\n\n超文化","previous_page":41,"next_page":43}