{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e","title":"消费社会","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305133039","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e","id":"447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e","uuid":"447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e","title":"消费社会","normalized_title":"消费社会","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305133039","isbns":["9787305133039"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":246,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%B6%88%E8%B4%B9%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/447ac7ca-331b-4629-b3f6-ca8ae9df773e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":83,"pdf_page":124,"physical_index":124,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e672b9a1d2d69fa43239af2ff6b5a3bd484d35ed8756bb2718ebb062927a7e56"},"chapter":"第二章 消费理论","content":"注释\n\n①“不平等”术语并不确切。平等与不平等的对立在意识形态上与现代民主价值体系联系在一起，完全涵盖的只是经济上的不相称，对于结构分析不起作用。\n\n②或最近引进法国的“大社会”。\n\n③就这一观点，参见下文《最小的公共文化与最小公倍数》。\n\n④消费的无限一面当然在第二层面(社会区分系统)。在第一层面(消费与交换系统)，人们可以将之同化为语言、财富和服务的“成品”材料(跟语言符号的成品材料一样，)能够足以使人像在原始社会里那样得到满足。语言不增生，因为在这方面不存在符号的两重性。它是建立在社会等级与双重的、同时的决定性之间的。相反，一定层次的口语和文笔又变成明显增生的地方。\n\n⑤就这一观点，稍后请参见《作为新生产力征象和控制的消费》。\n\n⑥这是需求的“后备军”。\n\n⑦这种不断增长的区别并不一定意味着一种自上而下的不断拉大的等级距离、一种整个“幅度的失调”，而是对一种不断增长的歧视，一种区分性的符号在少到极限的等级内部本身的加速比。一种一致化，一种相对的民主化总是伴随着更为激烈的合法竞争。\n\n⑧从这个意义上讲，“实际需求”与“人为的需求”之间的距离是一个假问题。当然，“人为的需求”掩盖了“核心”需求(电视取代了教育)的不满足。不过，与普遍物质增长的决定性(资本扩大再生产)相比，这是次要的。根据这种决定性，它既不是“自然的”也不是“人为的”。甚至这种包含人的目的性的，“自然的”\n\n第二章 消费理论\n\n83","previous_page":82,"next_page":84}