{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","uuid":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","normalized_title":"新辩证法与马克思的资本论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","isbns":["9787303230082"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%B0%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8E%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/search"},"page":{"printed_page":111,"pdf_page":134,"physical_index":134,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8a6134d460a654727464e79241470a3520c132a4578c039782b1258ff247f8a6"},"chapter":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","content":"货币也会使尺度明晰起来。因为货币作为一般等价物被假定为自为存在的价值后者区别于价值在其他商品外表下的内在存在，所以，货币可作为商品的尺度应用于商品之上。采用广为人知的说法：货币不仅解决了提供为价值所共有的尺度的量的问题，而且也通过将作为价值的商品相互联系起来而解决了建立诸商品可通约性的质的问题。马克思认为，物品作为商品（即作为价值）彼此之间是不冲突的，但作为使用价值却彼此冲突，直到在实践中出现一般等价物为止：正是通过诸商品之间的“社会行为”，一种特殊的代表其他所有商品价值的商品才会被分离出来。“由于这种社会过程，充当一般等价物就成为被分离出来的商品的独特的社会职能。这个商品就成为货币。”①\n\n货币作为价值表达即作为价值尺度的存在形态，其第一个职能是充当价值的测量手段。实际被测量的是什么呢?将货币与其他测量手段比如格尺和称作类比是很具有误导性的，因为货币在统一体中构成价值，而非充当商品所拥有的、先于它们可通约性的某种属性的典范。货币是可交换性的“外在”尺度，而价值是其内在尺度。但是就价值到目前为止被确定为纯粹形式而言，在尺度上并不存在任何(类比于质量或长度）实质性的东西。（我们强调，商品在我们的叙述中尚未被确定为产品，因此我们在这里对诸如社会必要劳动时间的内在规定性其实是一无所知的。)\n\n第5章马克思的《资本论》与黑格尔的《逻辑学》\n\n111\n\n①《马克思恩格斯文集》第5卷，106页。","previous_page":110,"next_page":112}