{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","uuid":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","normalized_title":"新辩证法与马克思的资本论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","isbns":["9787303230082"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%B0%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8E%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/search"},"page":{"printed_page":131,"pdf_page":154,"physical_index":154,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3dbe73147c421e6f2c60e1d163c5af6fbf7d3ae1a999c773727f11642ba7d4e8"},"chapter":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","content":"第一个否定再研究\n\n现在我要对个人财产之否定的辩证法提供另一种理解。这种解释抛弃了具有因果起源问题式的历史性视角，转而采用要求在逻辑条件中解释“起源”的结构性问题式，此即是说，它明确地表述了体系自我生产的基础。为了做到这一点，将资本主义的历史命运那一节中有关否定的讨论③与剩余价值转化为资本那一章④联系起来是富有启发性的。\n\n在研究资本形式时，马克思首先仅仅根据剩余价值产生于的流通中其中货币回流来定义它，随后才将之奠基于对剩余劳动的占有。他将M—C—M′循环称作“过程中的价值”，而将资本称作“自动的主体”。资本在随后的变形中与自身的等同性被表达在“货币形式”中。但这种“自行运动的实体”不仅假定了商品和货币的形式，而且在某种程度上“可以说是同它自身发生私自关系”，因为它从作为剩余价值的自身中区分出“作为原价值的自身”，当两者被结合成新的资本时，它们才扬弃这个区别并“合为一体”。①\n\n第6章马克思《资本论》中的否定之否定\n\n131\n\n①是否曾经存在简单商品生产制度？如果它曾经存在，那么它服从哪种价值规律？如果它服从某种价值规律的话，那么它是否能从自身中产生资本主义？这些问题都是有争议的。我怀疑所有这些假设，见本书第2章。\n\n②《马克思恩格斯全集》第30卷，499页。\n\n③即《资本论》中文版第1卷第24章第7节。见《马克思恩格斯文集》第5卷，第24章。—译者注\n\n④即《资本论》中文版第1卷第22章。见《马克思恩格斯文集》第5卷，第22章。——译者注","previous_page":130,"next_page":132}