{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","uuid":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","normalized_title":"新辩证法与马克思的资本论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","isbns":["9787303230082"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%B0%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8E%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/search"},"page":{"printed_page":172,"pdf_page":195,"physical_index":195,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"203adaa91850fbd576b0614b53f4cca4cc2541955428401624a05fbecd1ee7a7"},"chapter":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","content":"在这样一篇短文中，如此大的命题必然呈现出纲领性的特征。只有观点的最基本含义可以给出。首先给出商品交换的形式理论性解释，接下来以“非存在”(Nothing)与“存在”(Being）的辩证法为基础概述价值的基础本体论，最后证明这种“非存在”的幽灵是支配性的。\n\n商品交换\n\n这一部分将用“使用价值”和“交换价值”范畴分析商品交换的本质。我在这里采用马克思的术语，所以如下一点应该得到解释：在他的用法中，“使用价值”被认为是相关物品的自然存在(body)。正是内在于物品的各种属性使其具有各种用途，但马克思并不关注这些关系，他实质性地使用这一术语，以至于有可能把一种商品称作“一种”使用价值。当使用价值与其“价值”做对比时，以这种方式提出这一点加深了悖论的意味，因为马克思不是在关系的意义上（在这里价值代表一种交换比率）谈论它，而是再一次实质性地谈论它，以至于可以把商品说成是“一种”价值。因此这里存在实体共在论(consubstantiation)。可以说每一种商品的自身都“包含”两种实体，即它的使用价值和价值。前者对每一种商品来说都是特殊的，但后者却是（以资本主义方式生产出来的）普遍实体，每个商品都只是其实例或特定数量。\n\n172\n\n新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","previous_page":null,"next_page":173}