{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","uuid":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","normalized_title":"新辩证法与马克思的资本论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","isbns":["9787303230082"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%B0%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8E%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/search"},"page":{"printed_page":179,"pdf_page":202,"physical_index":202,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9eba9ee9a509970ae23a9bc2a796d473f263416c2505364d53a80a6d477c815b"},"chapter":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","content":"价值本体论\n\n我们已经阐明了商品二因素（作为使用价值与作为价值）并描述了货币交换，为的是定位资本辩证法(将于稍后讨论)。这一点非常重视我们关于交换价值的形成与使用价值的缺失相一致的观点的重要意义。\n\n罗伊·巴斯卡已经表明，本体论单一性(ontological monovalence)作为对现实的纯粹实证解释并不能解释真实的否定或缺失。应该承认，缺失(absence)与存在(presence)一样都是现实（reality)。①而且，既然“缺失”是真实的过程，那么通过这个过程而成为缺失的东西就不是纯粹的“无”(nothing)，而是由产生它的特定过程所形成的“有规定性的无”。现在我们要在这一语境下通过确认如下一点即价值通过对使用价值的有规定性的否定而在交换过程中形成而定位价值理论。尽管这篇论文的主题是交换和流通建立了一个纯粹形式、没有内容并因此把控生产的“理念世界”，但这是与突现力唯物主义（emergentpowers materialism）相一致的，并实际上也依赖于后者。②焦点在于使用价值的有规定性的缺失的突现性属性。由于突现力的机制，有可能假定：如果在基础层次上存在真实的有规定性的非存在(realdeterminate non-being)，那么更复杂的实践也许会将它再次确定为伪实证的存在(pseudo-positivepresence)。价值将被证明标识出一个“空洞的存在”(empty presence)，并且如下观点将被论证：这种幽灵般的客观性占了经济生活内容的上风。\n\n第8章 资本的幽灵\n\n179\n\n① R. Bhaskar, Dialectic, Chapter 2,1993.\n\n②“突现(emergence)：两个项之间的关系是这样的，即一个产生自另一个，但却能反作用于它，并且在任何情况下对它都是不可或缺的无论是从因果关系上说还是从分类学上说。”R.Bhaskar，Dialectic，1993，p.397.","previous_page":178,"next_page":180}