{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","uuid":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","normalized_title":"新辩证法与马克思的资本论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","isbns":["9787303230082"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%B0%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8E%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/search"},"page":{"printed_page":237,"pdf_page":260,"physical_index":260,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"791a6f9e9a3dc1869199326083494d57acec8ddb7be52fc8c052f7bfd8c4cb67"},"chapter":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","content":"我跟从提克肯，认为苏联不存在任何生产方式。这个纯粹否定性定义除了承诺它的解体之外并不意味着其他。让我们给这个理论以更多内容。什么是生产方式?它是社会形式与物质内容的稳定的和相对和谐的结合。马克思有一句轻率的名言(glibaphorism)，“手推磨产生的是封建主的社会，蒸汽磨产生的是工业资本家的社会”③。它必须被这样理解：在这种结合中，这些因素并不是彼此无关的，它们也不表现为单向决定(马克思的段落被误读为技术决定论)，相反，这些因素是辩证地内在相关的。正是这种形式形成并发展这种内容。因此，资本的社会形式通过其竞争趋向和扩大生产趋向产生了蒸汽机，并且它极大地促进了由它引发的劳动生产力，使资本主义践踏了所有前资本主义形式。如果社会形式和物质内容发生矛盾，这将导致麻烦。例如，马克思认为生产力的日益社会化和联合起来的劳动过程将表明它们不相容于其资本主义外壳。\n\n在我看来，苏联的生产关系总是遭受形式和内容不一致之苦。它是自我流产的怪物。物质与其不幸的起点并非毫无关系。除了大量的政治劝诱，孤立的苏联并没有人力和技术资源去避免复制资本主义技术。但当工厂被纳入非常不同的社会形式其特征是缺失资本逻辑但保证就业中时，生产力就被抛到一边，剥削是无效率的，控制必须以新的方式即由警察国家支撑的官僚组织\n\n第10章没有弹簧的钟表：苏联的墓志铭\n\n237\n\n① F. Füredi, The Soviet Union Demysti fied, 1986, p. 103.\n\n②F. Füredi, The Soviet Union Demysti fied, 1986, p. 124.\n\n③见《马克思恩格斯文集》第1卷，602页。——译者注","previous_page":236,"next_page":238}