{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","id":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","uuid":"44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","normalized_title":"新辩证法与马克思的资本论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230082","isbns":["9787303230082"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%B0%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8E%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/44d73a0d-6bfb-41d9-850e-a0b0cd3fe629/search"},"page":{"printed_page":244,"pdf_page":267,"physical_index":267,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0263d5a5b52bd8b5c0b77f1f1a461f7da3581163c7a3d91ff9c39296b2ae5d96"},"chapter":"新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》","content":"现在让我们转向梅扎罗斯关于资本的定义。他的观点的结构性要求是，资本的标准要比资本主义的标准更抽象，以至于资本主义可被降格为资本体系的一种形式，但它又不能过于抽象，以至于无法理解没有资本关系据说貌似合理地存在于其中的诸制度。我认为这种要求(remit)是无法实现的，事实上它也无法被梅扎罗斯所贯彻。他关于资本的四点定义可被简化为两部分，因为第1、2、4点定义都是关于劳动者异化的，而只有第3点定义涉及资本的存在，后者在这里被定义为“不断地自我扩张”的“利己的价值”。然而对于我们在这里要如何严肃地使用“价值”术语这一点是不清楚的，因为梅扎罗斯一般地未谈及剩余价值而只谈及剩余劳动，例如他说苏联的“资本积累”“通过政治上控制的剩余劳动的榨取来保证”①。但要一带而过和摆脱对“剩余价值”和“剩余劳动”的探讨是不可以的后者的存在(它对于所有剥削性生产方式来说是共有的)完全不能证明资本的存在，对马克思的任何理性阅读可知：资本是通过利润积累起来的价值。\n\n244\n\n新辩证法与马克思的《资本论》\n\n①I.Mészáros，BeyondCapital，1995，p.780.[英]梅扎罗斯：《超越资本—关于一种过渡理论》下，941页。","previous_page":243,"next_page":245}