{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","uuid":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","normalized_title":"capitalistrealismistherenoalternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","isbns":["9781846943171"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Capitalist%20Realism%20-%20Is%20There%20no%20Alternative","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":17,"pdf_page":22,"physical_index":22,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"45cb5792d0372cf68962ec35205eb64d7a94787d8e4d936d3e770786c9ec8186"},"chapter":"MARK FISHER CAPITALIST REALISM IS THERE NO ALTERNATIVE?","content":"category of value in the ethical sense. Over the past thirty years, capitalist realism has successfully installed a 'business ontology' in which it is simply obvious that everything in society, including healthcare and education, should be run as a business. As any number of radical theorists from Brecht through to Foucault and Badiou have maintained, emancipatory politics must always destroy the appearance of a 'natural order', must reveal what is presented as necessary and inevitable to be a mere contingency, just as it must make what was previously deemed to be impossible seem attainable. It is worth recalling that what is currently called realistic was itself once 'impossible': the slew of privatizations that took place since the 1980s would have been unthinkable only a decade earlier, and the current politicaleconomic landscape (with unions in abeyance, utilities and railways denationalized) could scarcely have been imagined in 1975. Conversely, what was once eminently possible is now deemed unrealistic. 'Modernization', Badiou bitterly observes, ‘is the name for a strict and servile definition of the possible. These 'reforms' invariably aim at making impossible what used to be practicable (for the largest number), and making profitable (for the dominant oligarchy) what did not used to be so'.\n\nAt this point, it is perhaps worth introducing an elementary theoretical distinction from Lacanian psychoanalysis which Žižek has done so much to give contemporary currency: the difference between the Real and reality. As Alenka Zupancic explains, psychoanalysis's positing of a reality principle invites us to be suspicious of any reality that presents itself as natural. 'The reality principle', Zupancic writes,\n\nis not some kind of natural way associated with how things are ... The reality principle itself is ideologically mediated; one could even claim that it constitutes the highest form of ideology, the ideology that presents itself as empirical fact (or biological, economic...) necessity (and that we tend to perceive as non-ideological). It is precisely here that we should be most alert to the functioning of ideology.\n\nCapitalism and the Real\n\n17","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}