{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","id":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","uuid":"4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title":"Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative","normalized_title":"capitalistrealismistherenoalternative","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781846943171","isbns":["9781846943171"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":88,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Capitalist%20Realism%20-%20Is%20There%20no%20Alternative","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":27,"pdf_page":32,"physical_index":32,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6a77248b7fa366467bbebb2fa043e972b554d6780171f98ee89dd6f5957caa90"},"chapter":"MARK FISHER CAPITALIST REALISM IS THERE NO ALTERNATIVE?","content":"the end constitute an alternative to British reflexive impotence. That the neoliberal Economist would deride French opposition to capitalism is hardly surprising, yet its mockery of French 'immobilization' had a point. 'Certainly the students who kicked off the latest protests seemed to think they were re-enacting the events of May 1968 their parents sprang on Charles de Gaulle', it wrote in its lead article of March 30, 2006.\n\nThey have borrowed its slogans ('Beneath the cobblestones, the beach!') and hijacked its symbols (the Sorbonne university). In this sense, the revolt appears to be the natural sequel to [2005]'s suburban riots, which prompted the government to impose a state of emergency. Then it was the jobless, ethnic underclass that rebelled against a system that excluded them. Yet the striking feature of the latest protest movement is that this time the rebellious forces are on the side of conservatism. Unlike the rioting youths in the banlieues, the objective of the students and public-sector trade unions is to prevent change, and to keep France the way it is.\n\nIt's striking how the practice of many of the immobilizers is a kind of inversion of that of another group who also count themselves heirs of 68: the so called 'liberal communists' such as George Soros and Bill Gates who combine rapacious pursuit of profit with the rhetoric of ecological concern and social responsibility. Alongside their social concern, liberal communists believe that work practices should be (post) modernized, in line with the concept of 'being smart'. As Žižek explains,\n\nBeing smart means being dynamic and nomadic, and against centralized bureaucracy; believing in dialogue and cooperation as against central authority; in flexibility as against routine; culture and knowledge as against industrial production; in spontaneous interaction and autopoiesis as\n\nReflexive impotence\n\n27","previous_page":null,"next_page":28}